Yeah, I have an opinion, and I can sum it up real easy: I don't want health insurance, I want health care.

When I'm not feeling well, I want to be able to go to a doctor without worrying about how much it's going to cost. If the doctor recommends tests or a specialist, I want to be able to get them or go there without having to get permission, If I need to take prescription drugs, or get a follow-up therapy, I want to be able to get them at an affordable price and without having to do a stack of paperwork for every appointment.

Don't let the health insurance companies and the health care syncopates in congress bullshit you. Our health care industry is about making money for the health insurance companies. Health insurance companies make money by:

• Denying claims
• Raising rates
• Canceling coverage for sick people

Consumer choice doesn't have much play when it comes to health care. Insurance companies aren't in business for your health, they're in business for profit. That means paying for your health care is a loss from their point of view. This means insurers try to deny as many claims as possible, they try to avoid covering people who might actually need care, and they try to cancel people who have shown they need care.

I saw Rush Limbaugh, the fat pig, on TV last night, talking about anyone who needed health care could get it, all they had to do was go to the emergency room. If you're in a car accident, or shot, or have an acute problem, that's true. But once your not going to die, you're on your own. Try getting follow-up therapy or treatment. Try getting chemotherapy or radiation for cancer. Try getting an organ replaced. You're not going to get it unless you have insurance or pay yourself. And even if you do have insurance, they will cancel you the first chance they get, or blackmail your company into firing you so you're no longer covered.

Universal health care is implemented in all but one of the wealthy, industrialized countries. Can you guess what that country is? I bet you can. Estimates put support for universal health care at 70 - 75%. Why aren't our elected officials listening? Money in their pockets, that's why.

All together: Health care isn't about health, and it isn't about care, it's about making money.

I heard some Republican ass-clown say, "Health care should be between people and the government, it should be between people and their doctor." If that's the case, ass-clown, then why is health care currently between people and-if they're lucky enough to even have it-their health care company? How can you spout such complete and utter nonsense?

Congress needs to stop protecting insurance companies and start protecting people. In the U.S. health care has become a privilege, another tool used to keep you compliant to you capitalist master. I say it again: the United States remains the only industrialized country in the world that doesn’t guarantee health care to all its citizens.

Did you know members of the U.S. Representatives and Senators alike receive some of the best health care benefits in the country, much of it paid for with taxpayer dollars? Yet these same members are unwilling to extend similar protections to the rest of America. As soon as members of Congress are sworn in, they may participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). The program offers an assortment of health plans from which to choose, including fee-for-service, point-of-service, and health maintenance organizations (HMOs). In addition, Congress members can also insure their spouses and their dependents.

Not only does Congress get to choose from a wide range of plans, but there’s no waiting period. Unlike many Americans who must struggle against precondition clauses or are even denied coverage because of those preconditions, Senators and Representatives are covered no matter what - effective immediately.

And here’s the best part. The government pays up to 75 percent of the premium. That government, of course, is funded by taxpayers, the same taxpayers who often cannot afford health care themselves. Despite the services that members of Congress receive at the taxpayer’s expense, they’ve done little on behalf of those who cannot afford or cannot get health care. Their attention is instead focused on the financial well being of pharmaceutical and insurance companies.

Case in point: according to the Medicare Reform Act of 2004, Medicare is prohibited from negotiating with pharmaceutical companies for lower prices. That means the pharma companies get to charge whatver they want. Not only is this negotiating power available to governments in other industrialized countries, it’s also similar to the power granted to the FEHBP, which itself is permitted to negotiate premiums and prices. Yet another case of they get what they won't give you.

So while our elected official luxuriate in any-where, any-time, afforable health care, all the while snatching the dollars flung at them by big pharma and insurance companies, millions of Americans are receiving inadequate health care, and millions more could lose their health insurance at any time since it's tied to their employment. And those with insurance have seen their rates go up and up and their deductibles rise. Even with insurance, many end up medically bankrupt.

Yet throughout all this, one thing has remained steady--the health care coverage afforded members of Congress. If they’ve proven nothing else, they’ve shown taxpayers that they know how to take care of themselves, and their wallets.

There are no examples of successful health care based on the principles of the free market for one simple reason: in health care, the free market just doesn’t work. And people who say that the market is the answer are deluded or outright liars.

Or maybe they're our Congressmen, who don't have to worry about their health care at all.

Related stories:
Wendell Potter on Profits Before Patients

I'm probably behind the curve in offering my editorial, but nevertheless....

Last last Saturday I wandered down to the local version of sports bar to watch UFC 100. I was mainly interested in the Lesnar/Mir fight, but unfortunately I didn't last long enough to see it. The bar was standing room only, and after being on my feet for almost two hours, I gave up and wandered home. My back feels a lot better than it used to, but I'd reached my max. I didn't get to see the Lesnar/Mir fight live.

I did, however, find it the next morning on the Internet. Lesnar rode Mir like a kiddie ride outside a Walmart and scored an easy victory. He then proceeded to insult Mir, the event sponsor, and flip-off the crowd. Wow.

I'm not naive. The UFC is about making money, and the way you make money is to entertain people. Yet ask a fighter why he's there, and very few will say they go in the ring to entertain fans. There are lot of easier and less painful ways to go about entertaining people than fighting inside a cage. Those that say they do are fooling themselves. They might hope the fans are entertained, but the reason most of them go in the ring is to stand in front of the cave and test themselves in combat.

And when the dust settles and one man stands with his hand raised, axes are buried, man-hugs exchanged, and respect granted. Most of the time.

Maybe I've swallowed the Kung-Fu stereotype, but martial arts is supposed to have a mental and spiritual aspects. It's supposed to be about exploring yourself, developing discipline and growing all aspects of your being--mind, body and spirit. The renowned Japanese swordsman Myamoto Musashi found that the more sought excellence in his martial training, the more he sought excellence all things.

People get into martial arts for different reasons. They usually start out of a desire to learn some self defense skills or for fitness. Once basic skills are learned, some students quit while others continue to study for many different reasons; they enjoyed the exercise, they like advancing in rank. Maybe they get into sparring and enjoy the competitive aspect of the sport. There are even some thugs who take advantage of their skills to have power over others. They like to fight and they like to hurt people, usually by taking their martial skills down to the local bar.

Lesnar acted like a thug. His behavior was bad for mixed martial arts and set a poor example for the younger fans who might one day want to step into the ring themselves. There are a few other thugs in the sport as well, although I've never seen one carry it to as far an extreme as Lesnar did. Fighters like GSP and Diego Sanchez are examples of how MMA is much more about yourself than who you step into the ring with. These are the fighters we should be talking about, not Lesanr and Henderson, who struck a downed opponent he knew wouldn't be getting back up again. He can cliam 'the ref didn't stop me' all he wants, but that second shot came out of a desire to punish, not to win.

Nevertheless, the actions of Lesnar and Henderson will be good for the UFC's bottom line. Fans love to watch athletes they hate as much as those they love. Many of them value the violence over the sport and enjoyed seeing Bisping get that extra whack. Tickets will sell, pay-per-views will be purchased, shirts will be worn.

I was glad to hear White came down hard on Lesnar. I was glad Lesnar apologized. I'm sure he was caught up in the moment. Maybe he was having a WWE flashback. Maybe he, like Chris Leban, can move beyind the combat aspect of the sport and use as a means to self exploration and personal growth.

I just hope as MMA continues to grow, the mental and spiritual aspects of martial arts won't get left behind.

Want to be good at something? Really, really good? Talent doesn't matter. What matters is practice, 10,000 hours of it to be precise. That's 20 hours a week, or about 3 hours a day, for 10 years. Do that, and chances are you will be very, very good at what you do.

Many of us see such accomplished people and attribute their skill and resulting success to innate talent, but in his book Outliers: The Story of success, Malcolm Gladwell proposes that the outrageous success some individuals achieve is mainly the result of two things. Primarily, it is the result of hard work. Successful people don't just work harder, they work much, much harder. To a lessor extent, and depending on the industry, timing can also have a huge influence.

In his book, Gladwell defines what he calls the "10,000" hour rule, and address the subject of innate ability. We like to think some people are just born with a unique gift or talent that will enable them to rise to the top, seemingly without any effort. When Gladwell digs into the success of some of these people, he learns innate ability plays a much smaller role than preparation.

"The idea that excellence at performing a complex task requires a critical minimum level of practice surfaces again and again in studies of expertise. In fact, researchers have settled on what they believe is the magic number for true expertise: ten thousand hours."

So the question then becomes: What made these people different, in that they had the motivation and persistence to keep going to achieve that level of expertise? Why do some people burn out while others keep going? Most of us become bored far before we get close to that mythical 10,000 hours. Yet some others keep pushing forward. Why?

I see the pattern repeated time and again i my own life. I have had many interests, and most of them I stuck with until I reached a certain level of competence, and then I became bored, or disillusioned with the work I would have to do to keep getting better, and I quit.

Perhaps then the secret to success is not innate talent or ability, or even hard work, but rather the perseverance and persistence to keep doing the work until you achieve mastery. How do we keep ourselves interested in the seemingly endless effort and striving for improvement? Maybe the answer to that question is the secret of success. Maybe that persistence is the innate ability one needs to have to reach the highest levels of competence?